Syndication: Democrat and Chronicle (image credit: IMAGN)
The MVP race has ignited fresh debate as ESPN analyst Dan Orlovsky challenged the conventional metrics. His argument shifted the focus from individual brilliance to team impact, specifically highlighting Josh Allen's ability to maximize Buffalo's offensive potential.
Orlovsky, a former NFL quarterback turned analyst, weighed in on the Allen versus Lamar Jackson discussion. His insights carry extra significance given Buffalo's offensive transformation after losing star receiver Stefon Diggs.
The analyst presented his case during ESPN's "First Take" on Wednesday. His comments gained traction as Allen's MVP odds soared to -900, while Jackson remained at +550 despite superior statistical performances.
"It's not the great player award, it's the MVP the Most Valuable Player Award, if we just sparked out the offenses and took and talked about the difference in talent, Buffalo, I would tell you, one through 11 is a lesser talented offense than the Baltimore Ravens," Orlovsky said. "The quarterback's performance is elevating the group. That is the value of that role."
